Gemma 2 27B Instruct

27B

Google Gemma 2

⚠ Superseded · Prefer Gemma 3 27B IT

This index would suggest Gemma 3 27B IT instead today — longer context (8K → 128K tokens). The numbers below are still accurate; they are just for a model you probably should not start with. Compare the two →

Largest open Gemma 2. Strong reasoning; needs 24GB+ VRAM at Q4.

⬇ 157.0K HF downloads♥ 175 likesbartowski/gemma-2-27b-it-GGUF· stats from 10/20/2026
Consumer GPUPro GPU

8K

Max Context

3

Quant Variants

GGUF Q5_K_M

Best Quality

98.7%

Accuracy Retained

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = run on this site · Estimated = not run here: calculated, or a figure this site has not verified · Community = public reports

FormatLevelBPWVRAMPPL LossSpeedSourceActions
GGUFQ4_K_M4.8518.5 GB2.9%48 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
GGUFQ5_K_M5.6821.2 GB1.3%42 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
AWQINT4416.2 GB4.0%58 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF

Similar models

Compare with Gemma 2

Running Gemma 2 27B Instruct locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Gemma 2 27B Instruct needs about 18.8 GB — 15.7 GB of weights, 1.44 GB of KV cache and a 1.7 GB activation buffer. The smallest cards in this index that clear that comfortably are 24 GB ones — 4 of them, from the RTX 3090 up — and 31 of the 78 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 5.12 GB, taking the total to 24.4 GB. That is gentler than the parameter count suggests: only 23 of 46 layers keep a KV cache that grows with context, and 23 more cap theirs at a sliding window, so the cache scales at a fraction of the usual rate. The model's native window is 8K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 20 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 3 levels. Q5_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 1.3%. The fastest level listed is AWQ INT4 at about 58 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1 — an estimate, not a run on this site's hardware. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 — CUDA only, and now archived, so local use rather than serving.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Gemma 2 27B Instruct need?
About 18.8 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 24.4 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Gemma 2 27B Instruct run on a 24GB GPU?
Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 18.8 GB, which leaves 5.2 GB spare on a RTX 3090, or on any of the other 24 GB cards here (4 in all). That is the smallest size in this index that clears it comfortably; 31 of 78 do.
Which quantization of Gemma 2 27B Instruct should I use?
Q5_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (1.3%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 3 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q5_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Ships in
GGUFAWQ
Compared here
GGUF vs AWQ

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-10-20 RSS → /feed.xml