Best local LLM for Apple silicon
Short answer: Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B at IQ2_XXS for general use — 23.1 GB of Apple silicon, leaving 3.9 GB. Also: .
“Best” here means the largest model in its category that clears the card with headroom left, at the highest-quality quant that still fits. This index measures memory and published perplexity, not task quality — it cannot tell you which model answers better, and does not pretend to.
The picks
| For | Model | Quant | Est. VRAM | Headroom | Loss | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General · Coding · Images | Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B74B-A9B | IQ2_XXS | 23.1 GB | 3.9 GB | — | The largest model of any kind that fits this budget. Its quantizer published no perplexity figure, so none is quoted. It still fits at 32K context, which is what the headroom is for. |
Sized at 4K context with a 10% activation buffer; 88 of 112 models in the index clear this budget comfortably. Loss is the quantizer’s published perplexity figure against FP16, or a dash where none was published.
Cards this applies to
What fits is decided by capacity alone, so every card here returns the same list. What differs is how fast it reads the weights — each card’s page states its bandwidth and what that costs you.
- Mac M5 Ultra 512G1,200 GB/s
- Mac M5 Ultra 256G1,200 GB/s
- Mac M5 Max 128G614 GB/s
- Mac M5 Pro 64G307 GB/s
- Mac M5 32G153 GB/s
- Mac M4 Max 128G546 GB/s
- Mac M4 Max 36G410 GB/s
- Mac M4 Pro 48G273 GB/s
- Mac M4 Pro 24G273 GB/s
- Mac M3 Ultra 192G819 GB/s
- Mac M3 Max 128G400 GB/s
- Mac M3 Max 48G400 GB/s
- Mac M3 Pro 36G150 GB/s
- Mac M3 Pro 18G150 GB/s
- Mac M3 16G100 GB/s
- Mac M3 8G100 GB/s
- Mac M4 24G120 GB/s
- Mac M4 16G120 GB/s
- Mac M2 16G100 GB/s
- Mac M1 Max 64G400 GB/s
- Mac M1 16G68 GB/s
- Mac M1 8G68 GB/s
- Mac M2 Ultra 192G800 GB/s
- Mac M2 Max 96G400 GB/s
What does not fit
The nearest miss is Mixtral 8x7B Instruct. Its smallest build in this index, Q4_K_M, needs about 30.1 GB — 3.1 GB over Apple silicon, before any context beyond 4K. Offloading to system RAM will load it at a speed set by your RAM, which is a different machine rather than a smaller quant.
Pushing context
At 4K context 88 models clear this budget. At 16K it is 85, and at 32K it is 78. The weights do not change — the KV cache is what grows.
Check your exact context lengthBy unified memory
Apple silicon spans a wider range than any GPU tier, so one figure would not describe it. The largest model each configuration clears, and how many it runs in total — remember macOS keeps part of the pool and caps what one process may wire down, so budget below nameplate.
| Memory | Largest that fits | Models |
|---|---|---|
| 16 GB | DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite Instruct · 10.1 GB | 57 |
| 24 GB | Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct · 15.8 GB | 67 |
| 36 GB | Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B · 23.1 GB | 88 |
| 48 GB | Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B · 23.1 GB | 90 |
| 64 GB | GLM-4.5-Air · 37.2 GB | 92 |
| 128 GB | DBRX Instruct · 84.3 GB | 102 |
Common questions
What is the best local LLM for Apple silicon in 2026?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B at IQ2_XXS for general use — 23.1 GB of 36 GB, leaving 3.9 GB. . "Best" here means the largest model in its category that clears the card with headroom — this index measures memory and published perplexity, not task quality, so it cannot rank models on how well they answer.
How many models fit Apple silicon?
88 of the 112 models in this index clear it comfortably at 4K context — comfortably meaning the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory, so there is margin for the display and the runtime. At 16K that falls to 85, and at 32K to 78: the KV cache is what moves, not the weights.
What will not run on Apple silicon?
The nearest miss is Mixtral 8x7B Instruct: its smallest build here, Q4_K_M, needs about 30.1 GB — 3.1 GB over, before any context beyond 4K. Offloading part of it to system RAM will load it, at a speed set by your RAM rather than your chip; that is a different machine, not a smaller quant.
Do all Apple silicon cards run the same models?
They hold the same models — what fits is decided by capacity alone, so all 24 cards at this tier return this same list. What differs is how fast they read the weights: token generation reads the whole weight set once per token, so memory bandwidth sets the ceiling, and two cards with identical memory can be more than 2.5× apart on it. Each card's own page states its bandwidth and what that implies.